All of our investigation focuses on the partnership ranging from two head predictor details-genuine family members to the Fb and you may involvement inside the Twitter Relationships Maintenance Habits – and each other general and you can Myspace-particular connecting societal money. To check the relationship anywhere between these forms of bridging societal financing, control details, and the predictors i describe a lot more than, i went a few nested OLS regressions.
In the regression predicting Facebook-specific bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 5.4% of the variance, with gender (?=.207, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.098, p<.05) emerging as significant, such that women and those with higher self-esteem reported higher perceived Facebook bridging social capital. The addition of the Facebook usage variables-minutes on Facebook, total Facebook Friends, and actual friends-increased the R 2 to .131, with minutes (?=.144, p<.01) and actual friends (?=.218, p<.001) positively predicting Facebook bridging social capital, supporting H1a. 569, p<.001) increased the model's R 2 to .394 and provided support for H2a. Full results are presented in Table 2.
FRMB assesses brand new the total amount that victims report they engage in factors you to definitely rule attention to and you may intentionally nurture relationships for the site; these types of circumstances include responding to Friends’ implicit or explicit financing desires and you will creating “delighted birthday celebration” for the good Buddy’s Wall structure
In the regression sitios de citas asiÃ¡ticos ligitimate reales predicting general bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 9.3% of the variance; as with Facebook-specific bridging social capital, gender (?=.182, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.255, p<.001) were significant predictors. The addition of the time and Friends variables increased the R 2 to .168. Total Facebook Friends (?=.118, p<.05) emerged as a significant predictor in this model; however, the impact of actual friends (?=.190, p<.001) on general bridging social capital was stronger, supporting H1b. Adding Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors to the model increased the R 2 to .229, and the significant positive relationship between FRMB and bridging social capital (?=.278, p<.001) provided support for H2b. See Table 3 for the full regression model.
Our research question probed the relationship between the number of “actual” friends and users’ engagement in relationship maintenance activities (FRMB), as they relate to bridging social capital. First, we conducted an OLS regression (see Model 4 in Tables 2 and 3) using the same variables as used in previous analyses as well as an interaction term (actual friends by FRMB). The interaction term was significant in both the general (?=?.571, p<.05) and Facebook-specific (?=?.857, p<.001) bridging models, suggesting that the impact of FRMB on bridging social capital may be moderated by users' reported number of actual friends in their Facebook network. The significant negative term indicates that for Facebook users who report fewer actual friends on Facebook, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with a larger increase in bridging social capital than for users who reported more actual friends on the site.
To further examine this finding, we conducted a simple slopes analysis ( Aiken West, 1991). We observed effects of FRMB on bridging social capital at three levels of actual friends: (1) reported value, (2) reported value minus one standard deviation, and (3) reported value plus one standard deviation. Results indicated that FRMB’s influence on both Facebook-specific and general bridging social capital significantly differed across the three measurement points for actual friends. For all three levels, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with higher perceived bridging social capital (see Figure 1). However, those with the fewest actual friends saw the greatest gains in bridging social capital as their engagement in FRMB increased. An analysis of variance shows this difference across the three levels of actual friends is significant for Facebook-specific bridging social capital, F(82)= p<.001, and trends towards significance with general bridging social capital, F(86)=3.204 p=.077.
Within studies, we speak about the relationship anywhere between connecting personal funding and two elements out of Twitter have fun with compliment of questionnaire studies amassed of an example of You.S. people. I functioning several independent actions from bridging public capital-one determining advantages associated with affairs with a person’s community away from Myspace Family and the other emphasizing your relations along with his or the girl entire social media. Guaranteeing and you can broadening towards the previous degree from Facebook have fun with ( age.grams., Burke mais aussi al., 2011; Ellison et al., 2011), we find high positive relationship between such actions regarding connecting social capital and you may the quantity of “actual” Fb household members people report that he has got as well as their engagement inside Fb Dating Maintenance Behavior. This research causes all of our comprehension of this new interpersonal personality away from SNS fool around with by the (1) identifying just how users’ wedding in the public brushing practices understood over interact with attitudes regarding connecting societal financial support-both within Twitter Pal circle in addition to their social networking alot more broadly-and explicating the fresh social, structural, and you may appeal-filtering character and this sign up for so it relationships; (2) exploring the differences when considering seen total and you may “actual” Relatives on the internet site in relation to bridging societal funding outcomes; and you will (3) investigating variations in attitudes regarding standard connecting personal resource ranging from profiles and nonusers of web site.